?

Log in

No account? Create an account
link friday: cash grants for the poor, nonpartisan primaries are awesome, trouble in Wikipedialand - Greg [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Greg

[ website | gregstoll.com ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| * Homepage * Mobile apps (Windows Phone, Win8, Android, webOS) * Pictures * LJBackup * Same-sex marriage map * iTunesAnalysis * Where's lunch? ]

link friday: cash grants for the poor, nonpartisan primaries are awesome, trouble in Wikipedialand [Oct. 25th, 2013|01:36 pm]
Greg
[Tags|]
[Current Mood |busybusy]

- Research Finds Outright Grants of Cash Are Surprisingly Effective Form of Aid to the Poor - more evidence! (previously)

- California Sees Gridlock Ease in Governing - good for California, and I really wish more places would adopt nonpartisan primaries. (with the top two candidates going on to the general election)

- The Decline of Wikipedia - long article about how fewer people are editing Wikipedia, and the people that do aren't very diverse.

- T-Mobile Hands Consumers a Pleasant Shocker - amazing international rates for data! T-Mobile is awesome, although their network seems a bit worse than AT&T's...

- Eating popcorn in the cinema makes people immune to advertising - so, advertisers: no more ads at the movies!

- The 9 State Propositions Texans Will Vote On Next Week - nothing terribly interesting, except for Proposition 6 (the water one). Anyway, early voting has started, so find an early voting place here!

- Tea Party Group Leader: File 'Class Action Lawsuit' Against Homosexuality - too crazy not to share.
LinkReply

Comments:
From: Colin LeMahieu
2013-10-25 09:25 pm (UTC)
The article about cash grants was interesting though I feel the writer made some extra extrapolations and some might be unsound.

I think two critical pieces of information are:

[To get the cash, applicants had to form a group with others in their village and submit a proposal showing how they planned to use the money]

[Of thousands of applicants, 535 groups, were deemed eligible for grants]

It seems like this study was more than just randomly giving money to anyone who applied.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: gregstoll
2013-11-04 12:26 am (UTC)
Ah, that is a good point. Interestingly, on the same day I posted this, GiveDirectly announced the results of a study they did on whether unconditional cash transfers were helpful - it was controlled and in this one people didn't have to apply for money; they were just given it. The study's results are similarly promising.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)