Log in

No account? Create an account
Top Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing review - Greg [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ website | gregstoll.com ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Links:| * Homepage * Mobile apps (Windows Phone, Win8, Android, webOS) * Pictures * LJBackup * Same-sex marriage map * iTunesAnalysis * Where's lunch? ]

Top Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing review [Apr. 9th, 2013|08:39 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Top Dog: The Science of Winning and LosingTop Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing by Po Bronson
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

The book is all about competition and how it's generally a good thing - it makes most people perform better. Some tidbits:

- Apparently the "home field advantage" is a real thing, and covers a lot of weird situations - preschoolers playing a game are more likely to win if they're playing in their own classroom, for example.

- In general, it hurts to have people watching/cheering you on while you're learning a skill, but it helps after you've mastered it.

- In sports tournaments (i.e. golf and racing), the bigger the reward and the higher the spread between the 1st place and 2nd place rewards, the more aggressive they are.

- There's a specific genetic codon (COMT) that controls how well your brain handles stress, and thus what your optimal stress level is to get your best performance.

- There's a big difference between men and women when deciding to run for Congress - men will run if there's any chance of winning, while women won't unless they have at least a 20% chance or so.

- Girls tend to handle highly-competitive schools better than boys, because boys are more discouraged by repeatedly competing and losing.

Anyway, the book was decent, but I think it overgeneralized a bit. (there was a short bit about software development that I just rolled my eyes at) I think I might move on from neurotrash for a while.

View all my reviews